![]()
It’s these weaknesses that leave our systems the most vulnerable. There’s a ton we can do as administrators to minimize attack surfaces, like firewalls & closing unnecessary services, but sometimes our hands are tied with respect to not being able to shut down dangerous services because they are needed for business operation. When you combine this with a public facing attack surface it spells disaster even under a fully updated operating system □ #Veracrypt for ubuntu codeMost web developers will see their share of disgusting code and compromised sites, even from the big brands that you would expect to be better. I see HTTP scans too but the thing about these is that they’re not usually attacking OS or even HTTP daemons, they’re really scanning for vulnerable web applications like oscommerce, wordpress, magento, etc. #Veracrypt for ubuntu softwareThe moment I did the brute force attack stopped and presumably the false credentials were recorded by the attacking software for future use. I decided to try a different approach: I temporarily redirected the traffic to a honeypot that would accept erroneous logins. One such attack at home was so persistent and would not stop blasting packets my way even when blocked at the firewall. I see tons of brute force attacks over standard ports like SSH, IMAP, SMTP, and even SIP to gather usernames & credentials. Just open up a box to the net and look in the logs. Yeah Tricking people is also very lucrative, but there are plenty of automated scanners out there hunting for unpatched vulnerabilities. So let’s just tone down the better-than-thou commentary a bit □ This drama about unpatched systems needs to be put into perspective since most malware never makes it past the firewall anyways…not until the user executes it. But realistically the majority of successful attacks in the wild actually attack careless users rather than unpatched systems. So once again I’m not saying security patches are bad, quite the opposite. Yet not a single one of them depended on an unpatched linux system, they are all targeting human error/weaknesses to get access and from that point the code runs as the user with the operating system’s blessing. Many of these have sophisticated stealth payloads and innovative control channels that hide their presence from the operators. * /en-us/5/cloud-snooper-attack-bypasses-firewall-security-measures/įinSpy - fishing, convince user to run malicious spyware #Veracrypt for ubuntu installTycoon - convince user to run malicious trojanĬloud Snooper - unknown install method, possibly brute forced credentials * TrickBot - convince user to run malicious trojan Penquin_圆4 - convince user to run malicious trojanĭoki - exploits improperly configured docker containers who’s APIs are publicly exposed #Veracrypt for ubuntu windowsLucifer - attacks windows exploits, linux attacked through brute forcing creds. IPStorm - a massive botnet, the linux version infects by brute forcing ssh passwordsĭrovorub - malware payload or “rootkit”, but does not provide mechanism for infection. Gitpaste-12 - convince user to run malicious trojan RansomEXX Trojan - convince user to run malicious trojan It’s an interesting list, but let’s analyze it closer… What can protect them is antivirus software that is able to identify malware before it runs. Having updates enabled will not protect most users. Instead it gets installed through users voluntarily by masquerading as something innocent or some other form of user error. With that said though the fact is that most malware does not occur through internet facing vulnerabilities. I would never claim that any system is totally fool proof. #Veracrypt for ubuntu fullis being actively targeted these days full time by those who make their living off exploiting infected machines for everything from stealing bank accounts to cryptomining and if you think you aren’t affected because you run some Linux distro? Guess what you are currently an even more juicy target than many Windows users. You shouldn’t run ANY Operating system in 2020 connected to the net without security patches, full stop. I think you missed the point about updates being turned into a sneaky mechanism to push unwanted features and that is what’s bad. Nobody is arguing that security patches are bad. Does nobody remember what a clusterf*ck from hell it was when users could trivially turn off updates? Remember all the worms, viruses, and malware that was constantly spreading willy nilly all over the place? Sigh…really? Are we REALLY gonna have people here argue that not having SECURITY PATCHES is a good thing? It sounds like a fricking anti-vax convention in here. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |